My usual workflow for photos has been:

  • Develop a roll
  • Scan the negatives
  • Do a few adjustments in Affinity Photo
  • Share the good shots with folks

But as I’ve started to spend more time with those negatives in the darkroom I’ve noticed something. The prints I make are very different from the scanned negative.

Here’s a recent negative:

1/250, f11, Takumar Super Macro Takumar 50/f4

It’s nice enough. But when I followed my normal process for making a split-grade print in the darkroom I got this.

A black and white photo of a tulip blossom, taken from above. This is the printed version of the negative. It is darker overall but also focuses the highlights on the petals
Scan of a print made on RC Pearl Ilford paper, selenium toned

It’s a touch too dark. I’ve been trying to refine the shadows over subsequent prints. But the thing that jumps out to me even in this draft version of a print are the richness of the tones and the shimmering nature of the highlights on the petals. It’s a very different interpretation of the same negative.

Another example

A black and white photo of a birch tree growing on top of a rock. Its roots are visible and surround the rock before plunging in to the soil.
CatLabs 80, Yashica Mat, 1/10, f4 – Scanned Negative

And the print

A black and white photo of a birch tree growing on top of a rock. Its roots are visible and surround the rock before plunging in to the soil.

The printed version is a little darker, with deeper shadows around the roots and a clearer contrast between the shadowed and sunny parts of the tree.
Scan of a print made on FB Glossy Ilford paper, selenium toned

The print is moodier, and I find it more dynamic. The separation between the shadowed and sunny parts of the tree is more delineated. And the shadows under the roots are weightier.

I don’t doubt that I could use a photo editor and make my scanned negatives look more like my prints. But that requires a lot of time, both to learn the tool and then to tweak my negatives. And time is not something I have a lot of. And I don’t get a lot of enjoyment sitting at my laptop and tweaking filters, so why would I spend my limited time doing something I don’t really enjoy?

But I do enjoy my time in the darkroom, learning those tools and seeing the results. So if I’m going to spend time anywhere, it’s there.

I’m happy with that choice, but it also introduces a dilemma. If I want to share a film photo with someone do I wait until I’ve made a print that I’m happy with? If so I’ll probably only be able to share a few photos a month. Darkroom time is hard to come by in my life and a good print takes time.

What I think I’m going to do is share some scanned negatives but with a clear caption specifying that they are rough draft scans. And then, if I’m able to make a good print, share that as the “final” version.


One response to “Scanning or Printing?”

  1. Chris R Avatar
    Chris R

    That sounds an excellent idea. I really like the thought that even PP’d scans of negatives are “rough drafts”. Though, in my case, they stay that way. I’m way too old to get into darkroom printing ( wrote “back” in there, but I’ve removed it as I was never there… the sole recent silver print I had was mostly made by the late John Whitmoor at a one-to-one workshop he did with me. In theory he was getting me to do it, but I was so hopeless he really did end up doing it himself. I love it… except he put the neg in the holder upside down!).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *